Evidence and sources

Clear about what research supports—and what it does not.

Each Exereye routine carries an evidence grade based on how directly the cited work supports the routine as delivered in the app.

Our grading method

Grade A — Direct controlled evidence

A controlled study tested a substantially similar intervention in a relevant population. This is a high bar and most app-delivered routines do not meet it.

Grade B — Supportive evidence

Human evidence supports the underlying approach, but the study design, dose, population, or delivered protocol differs from Exereye.

Grade C — Limited or indirect evidence

The evidence is preliminary, population-specific, related to only one part of a combined protocol, or drawn from clinical practice rather than the app experience.

Grade D — No direct evidence

No direct evidence supports the exercise as delivered. We frame it as rest, awareness, or gentle movement—not as treatment.

How we write claims

  • We describe activity and comfort habits, not diagnoses or health scores.
  • We identify when a screen cue is only an approximation of a real-world task.
  • We do not generalize rehabilitation results from clinical populations to healthy screen users.
  • We link to the most relevant primary source whenever one exists.
  • We state when evidence is mixed or absent.

Current evidence map

The app contains exercise-specific rationales and citations. The maintained audit trail lives with the source code and is reviewed before release. Public guides expose the sources most relevant to each topic.

Browse evidence-aware guides →

Corrections

If you find a citation error, outdated source, or wording that overstates the evidence, contact support@exereye.app. We will review substantiated corrections and document material changes.